Skip to content
PeekWellThe Handbook
Join now

Subscription cancellation law: clear renewal, easy exit

At a glance

EU-13MediumCRD 2011/83/EU Arts. 6(1)(e), (o), (p), 8(2), 24; UCPD 2005/29/EC Arts. 5 to 7, 13

Peeky reads the public pages of a site that sells subscriptions and looks for clear renewal terms before purchase and a cancellation route a visitor can find.

Last checked against the source:

I need to fix thisI need the rule

The rule

Two EU instruments meet on subscriptions. The Consumer Rights Directive says what a trader must tell a consumer before the contract. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) asks whether the way the offer is presented, or the way leaving is made, misleads or pressures an average consumer. Neither has a chapter called “subscriptions”. Both reach them.

Article 6(1) requires the trader to provide, before the consumer is bound, a list of information “in a clear and comprehensible manner”. Three items matter here. Under point (e), “in the case of a contract of indeterminate duration or a contract containing a subscription, the total price shall include the total costs per billing period”. Under point (o), the trader gives “the duration of the contract, where applicable, or, if the contract is of indeterminate duration or is to be extended automatically, the conditions for terminating the contract”. Under point (p), the trader gives, “where applicable, the minimum duration of the consumer’s obligations under the contract”.

For online orders that carry an obligation to pay, Article 8(2) adds a point-of-order duty. The trader must make the consumer aware, “in a clear and prominent manner, and directly before the consumer places his order”, of the information in points (a), (e), (o) and (p) of Article 6(1). The order button must be labelled “only with the words ‘order with obligation to pay’” or an equally unambiguous formulation. If the trader has not complied, “the consumer shall not be bound by the contract or order.”

The point-of-order duty is the one that applies most directly to a renewing subscription. The renewal terms and the price per billing period have to be next to the button, not only in a terms page.

The UCPD prohibits unfair commercial practices (Article 5(1)). A practice is misleading by omission when a trader “hides or provides in an unclear, unintelligible, ambiguous or untimely manner” material information, and this “causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision that he would not have taken otherwise” (Article 7(2)). Article 6 covers presentation that deceives “in any way, including overall presentation”.

Enforcement has used the UCPD against the exit as well as the entrance. In July 2022 the Commission announced that Amazon had committed to bring its Prime cancellation into line with EU consumer rules, after a coordinated action by the Commission and national authorities that began in April 2021. The Commission said the change was necessary to comply with the UCPD in particular, and it described the problem as hurdles such as complicated navigation menus, skewed wording, confusing choices and repeated nudging.

Penalties are national. Article 24 of the Consumer Rights Directive and Article 13 of the UCPD leave the rules to Member States, which must make them “effective, proportionate and dissuasive”. For widespread infringements handled under the CPC Regulation (EU) 2017/2394, Member States must allow a maximum fine of at least 4% of the trader’s annual turnover in the Member States concerned (UCPD Art. 13(3); CRD Art. 24(3)). The Italian authority applied articles 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26(f) and 65-bis of the Italian Consumer Code in its Virgin Active decision.

A newer rule sits beside these. Directive (EU) 2023/2673 inserts Article 11a into the Consumer Rights Directive. From 19 June 2026, for distance contracts concluded through an online interface, the trader must offer a withdrawal function labelled “withdraw from contract here”, continuously available during the withdrawal period and prominently displayed, followed by a confirmation function. That is the 14-day withdrawal right. It is separate from ending a running subscription.

The Commission has also announced a Digital Fairness Act. The European Parliament’s legislative tracker lists it as announced, not adopted, expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, and aimed at difficulties with cancelling and renewing digital subscriptions.

What PeekWell checks and how

EU-13 asks two questions of a site that appears to sell subscriptions. Are the renewal terms stated where a visitor can read them before buying? Is a cancellation route described or linked? The scan answers from the public pages, not from what the company says in a contract.

The scan is automated, and this check applies only when it sees signs that the site sells subscriptions. It reads your pricing pages, checkout copy and terms for what they say about renewing and cancelling, and looks for a link to a way to cancel.

US-09 asks the same questions under the United States rule.

The scan has limits, and the report says so. It sees the public pages it visited, and the members area when you give it a sign-in. It doesn’t start a checkout, enter payment details, create an account or try to cancel, so it can’t see the label on the final order button or how many steps a cancel flow takes. It reads wording. It doesn’t decide what the wording legally amounts to. A Passed means the expected behaviour was observed on the pages scanned. It doesn’t say the site complies.

Why it matters for a company

These are matters authorities can read from the outside. The Italian authority’s decision on Virgin Active Italia in June 2025 ended in a fine of EUR 3 million. It found inadequate information about subscription terms, automatic renewal, cancellation and early termination, and no advance notice of renewal or of the cancellation deadline. The authority found that customers were not put in a position to decide consciously whether to subscribe or cancel.

The Amazon action ended without a fine, but with commitments applied to every EU website and device, and monitoring by the authorities. The Commission’s release includes screenshots of the new cancellation steps, which shows what it looked at: the screens a consumer sees.

For a company the consequences are practical. A missing statement before the order can leave the consumer not bound by the contract under Article 8(2). Article 8(2) asks for the terms directly before the order, so a terms page alone may not be enough. And money taken under unclear terms is a refund exercise, which is a cost on top of any penalty.

Smaller companies and larger companies

The rules have no size threshold. A sole trader and a listed group are measured against the same pre-contract information and the same test of what an average consumer would understand. Size shows up in the penalty and in how the problem arises.

In a small company the subscription is often a plan inside a hosted shop or a payment tool. The renewal sentence sits in a default template, or in terms copied from another site, and the cancel route is an email address nobody has tested. The Dutch authority fined a sole proprietor EUR 25,000 in 2022 for misleading telemarketing of puzzle subscriptions with unclear and incorrect cancellation information, and noted the business’s size when it set the amount.

In a larger company there are more screens and more owners. Marketing runs trials, product owns the account area, support owns the cancel flow, and a redesign can move the cancel link three levels down. The Amazon action is a case of exactly that: the problem was in the path, not in a missing page. A large company can also face several national authorities acting together, as the Amazon case shows.

Enforcement cases

Published decisions about other companies, listed for context. Each links to the authority's own page. They say nothing about any particular website.

The Officer, squinting at a file.

Larger companies

  • Amazon (Amazon Prime cancellation)

    European Commission and national consumer authorities (CPC network), 2022No fine; commitments

    After a complaint by consumer organisations, the Commission and national authorities reported many hurdles to cancelling Amazon Prime, including complicated navigation menus, skewed wording, confusing choices and repeated nudging. Amazon committed to let consumers in the EU and EEA cancel in two steps with a prominent cancel button, on all its EU websites and devices.

    Read the European Commission and national consumer authorities (CPC network) publication about Amazon (Amazon Prime cancellation)
  • Virgin Active Italia

    AGCM (Italy), 2025€3 million

    The AGCM found that the company gave inadequate information on subscription terms, automatic renewal, cancellation and early termination, and omitted advance notice of automatic renewal and of the deadline for sending a formal cancellation. It said customers were not able to decide consciously whether to subscribe or cancel.

    Read the AGCM (Italy) publication about Virgin Active Italia
  • FitX (gym chain cancellation page)

    Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), on a claim by the Federation of German Consumer Organisations (vzbv), 2026No fine; court order to stop the practice

    The gym chain's cancel button led to a confirmation page that, at the top, pointed members to the option of pausing their contract instead, with a link. The court held that once someone uses the cancel button, the confirmation page may only collect the details needed to cancel, with no extra offers or alternatives.

    Read the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), on a claim by the Federation of German Consumer Organisations (vzbv) publication about FitX (gym chain cancellation page)
  • Otto GmbH & Co. KGaA (Otto UP Plus)

    Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), on a claim by the Federation of German Consumer Organisations (vzbv), 2025No fine; court order to stop the practice

    The retailer sold a twelve-month benefits programme online for a one-off EUR 9.90 without a cancel button on its website for ending the contract early for good cause. The court held that a contract running over time needs the online cancel button even when the price is paid once and the contract ends by itself.

    Read the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), on a claim by the Federation of German Consumer Organisations (vzbv) publication about Otto GmbH & Co. KGaA (Otto UP Plus)
  • Sky Italia (Sky and NOW cancellation route)

    AGCM (Italy), 2025No fine; binding commitments

    The AGCM alleged that the customer areas on sky.it and now.it and the apps had no section clearly explaining how to cancel, that the NOW app did not allow cancelling online, that the online cancel path had many cumbersome steps and promotional pop-ups, and that sponsored search results pointed only to cancelling by phone. Sky committed to change its websites, apps and call-centre guidance, and the authority made the commitments binding without a finding.

    Read the AGCM (Italy) publication about Sky Italia (Sky and NOW cancellation route)

Smaller companies

  • Servicecollect (sole proprietor)

    ACM (Netherlands), 2022€25,000

    The ACM found that the business sold puzzle subscriptions by telephone under several brand names without saying clearly at the start who was calling and why, and gave unclear and incorrect information about cancelling. It took into account that the business is a sole proprietor when it set the fine.

    Read the ACM (Netherlands) publication about Servicecollect (sole proprietor)
  • Plus Global ApS (plusshop.dk)

    Retten i Aalborg (Denmark), case pursued by the Danish Consumer Ombudsman, 2025DKK 400,000 fine

    The court found that the web shop sold shampoo, creams and cleaning products without making clear that each purchase also signed the buyer up to a running subscription of DKK 139 a month, and without stating that price clearly. It said the membership, although mentioned, receded into the background behind the products. The Ombudsman is seeking to appeal the part of the period for which the company was acquitted.

    Read the Retten i Aalborg (Denmark), case pursued by the Danish Consumer Ombudsman publication about Plus Global ApS (plusshop.dk)
  • GN Triova ApS (Flipsu.dk)

    Østre Landsret (Denmark), on a police report by the Danish Consumer Ombudsman, 2025DKK 100,000 fine and DKK 1,675,000 profit confiscated

    The High Court found that the web shop sold cosmetics at low prices and signed buyers up to a subscription of DKK 89 a month without making them clearly aware of it, and that the subscription information was presented in an unclear way that misled consumers. Buyers found out only after paying for several months, charged to the card they had used for the purchase.

    Read the Østre Landsret (Denmark), on a police report by the Danish Consumer Ombudsman publication about GN Triova ApS (Flipsu.dk)
  • Fitnessmentor Klub (gym in Viborg)

    Danish Consumer Ombudsman, 2026No fine; finding, and the term was removed during the case

    The Consumer Ombudsman found that the gym's four membership types tied members for 12 months, although a running membership must be cancellable after five months with one month's notice, and that its website and terms did not state clearly the minimum price, the minimum duration or the conditions for cancelling. The gym removed the 12-month term from its terms and marketing during the case.

    Read the Danish Consumer Ombudsman publication about Fitnessmentor Klub (gym in Viborg)
  • Ruokaboksi Finland Oy (meal-box service)

    Finnish Consumer Ombudsman (KKV), 2022No fine; the company committed to change its marketing

    The Consumer Ombudsman found that the meal-box service was marketed on its website, on social media and by phone with words such as 'trial box' and 'test customer' (in Finnish), giving the impression of a one-off order, when buyers in fact entered an open-ended subscription with seven days' notice. It also required clear pre-contract information on duration and the 14-day withdrawal right, and the company committed to stop using those words for the subscription.

    Read the Finnish Consumer Ombudsman (KKV) publication about Ruokaboksi Finland Oy (meal-box service)

How to fix it

The steps follow the order a visitor meets the information. Step 2 reflects Article 8(2), which asks for the renewal terms and the price per billing period directly before the order is placed.

  1. Walk the path as a customer. Open the site in a private window, read the pricing page, start the signup up to the last step without paying, then try to find how to cancel. Write down every place the renewal terms are or are not stated.
  2. Put the terms next to the button. Directly above the order button, state in plain words the price per billing period, whether it renews automatically, the length of any minimum period, and how to end it. Label the button with words that say it creates an obligation to pay.
  3. Say how trials convert. If a free or discounted trial turns into a paid plan, say when and at what price, on the same screen as the trial offer.
  4. Make the cancel route findable. Put a plain link, such as “Cancel subscription”, in the account area, the footer or the help page, and in the terms. If people sign up online, let them cancel online without a phone call or a chat.
  5. Remove friction from the exit. Keep the path short. Drop distracting warnings, unclear button labels and repeated prompts at the moment someone cancels, and send a confirmation.
  6. Add the withdrawal function where it applies. For consumer contracts concluded online, add the “withdraw from contract here” function and the “confirm withdrawal” step that Article 11a describes.
  7. Re-scan. Run a scan again. The finding should clear once the renewal sentence and a reachable cancellation route are on the public pages.

Whether a given wording satisfies a particular authority is a question for your legal adviser, and Peeky reports only what it sees.

Questions

Is a subscription allowed to renew automatically?

Yes, but the trader has to say so before the order. Article 6(1)(o) of the Consumer Rights Directive asks for the conditions for ending a contract that is to be extended automatically, and Article 6(1)(e) asks for the total price per billing period.

Countries can add their own limits. The Dutch authority, for example, says a subscription cannot be converted automatically into a new fixed term once the first period has ended.

Does a website have to offer online cancellation?

There is no single EU-wide cancel button rule for subscriptions yet, but authorities have treated cancellation hurdles as unfair. In the Amazon Prime action the Commission said the change it obtained was necessary to comply with the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive.

Some national laws go further, and the Commission has announced a Digital Fairness Act for the end of 2026 that is expected to cover subscription cancellation.

What is the withdrawal button?

It is a function labelled "withdraw from contract here" that online traders are asked to offer for the 14-day withdrawal right. Article 11a of the Consumer Rights Directive, added by Directive 2023/2673, applies from 19 June 2026.

It covers withdrawal in the first days after the contract. It is not a general button for ending a subscription later.

What is a subscription trap?

It is a setup where joining is quick and leaving is slow. The Commission's 2022 Amazon Prime release describes the pattern: long navigation, distracting text, unclear button labels and repeated nudges at the moment someone tries to cancel.

Authorities look at the whole path a consumer takes, not just whether a cancel option exists somewhere.

How does Peeky check renewal terms and cancelling?

Peeky reads the public pages of your site, finds the sentences about renewal, price and cancelling, and looks for a link or described route to cancel. It never signs up, enters payment details or tries to cancel. How a scan works has the full path.

Filed with

The rule

Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83/EU, Arts. 6(1), 8(2) and 24, as amended by Directive (EU) 2019/2161 and Directive (EU) 2023/2673

Read the rule (Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83/EU, Arts. 6(1), 8(2) and 24, as amended by Directive (EU) 2019/2161 and Directive (EU) 2023/2673)

A case

Amazon (Amazon Prime cancellation)

European Commission and national consumer authorities (CPC network), 2022

Read the decision (Amazon (Amazon Prime cancellation))

Your site

Is your website affected? Join now to find out.

Join now

Sources

The law

  1. Directive 2011/83/EU (Consumer Rights Directive), Official Journal text, Arts. 6, 8 and 24
  2. Directive 2005/29/EC (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive), Official Journal text, Arts. 5, 6, 7 and 13
  3. Directive (EU) 2023/2673, Official Journal of 28 November 2023 (Art. 11a, withdrawal function; applies from 19 June 2026)
  4. Directive (EU) 2019/2161 (Omnibus Directive), amending the Consumer Rights Directive and the UCPD, including penalties
  5. Germany, § 312k BGB: cancelling consumer contracts online (the cancel button, "Verträge hier kündigen")

Guidance

  1. European Commission, Guidance on the interpretation and application of Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights (2021/C 525/01)
  2. European Commission, Guidance on the interpretation and application of Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices (2021)
  3. ACM (Netherlands), Rules on subscription renewals and cancellations
  4. Danish Consumer Ombudsman, Uønskede abonnementer (unwanted subscriptions): price, binding period and cancellation terms directly before the order

Decisions and cases

  1. European Commission, press release of 1 July 2022: Amazon Prime changes its cancellation practices to comply with EU consumer rules
  2. AGCM (Italy), press release of June 2025 on Virgin Active Italia, procedure PS12879
  3. AGCM (Italy), Bollettino n. 17 of 5 May 2025: commitments by Sky Italia on how to cancel Sky and NOW subscriptions, PS12802
  4. vzbv (Germany), BGH judgment of 16 July 2026, I ZR 200/25: no pause offer on the FitX cancel confirmation page
  5. vzbv (Germany), BGH judgment of 22 May 2025, I ZR 161/24: Otto needs a cancel button for its one-off-fee benefits programme
  6. Danish Consumer Ombudsman, 31 October 2025: web shop Plus Global ApS fined DKK 400,000 for hidden subscriptions
  7. Danish Consumer Ombudsman, 30 June 2025: Østre Landsret fines GN Triova ApS (Flipsu.dk) and confiscates its profit from hidden subscriptions
  8. Danish Consumer Ombudsman, press release of 1 October 2026: Fitnessmentor Klub used and marketed a 12-month binding period without clear cancellation terms
  9. Finnish Consumer Ombudsman (KKV), decision of 12 May 2022 on Ruokaboksi Finland Oy: 'trial' marketing of an open-ended subscription, pre-contract information and withdrawal
  10. Finnish Consumer and Competition Authority (KKV), press release of 21 July 2022: the Ruokaboksi one-off trial was in fact a continuing subscription
  11. Danish Consumer Ombudsman, press release of 1 May 2026: Reva Group ApS (findboliger.dk, rentola.dk) reported to the police over low intro prices that turn into a subscription renewed every 28 days
  12. Danish Consumer Ombudsman, press release of 29 April 2026: KlubKlub ApS reported to the police over a DKK 89 monthly subscription bundled with purchases
  13. Danish Consumer Ombudsman, case 23/03861 (2023): streaming service may not send customers who signed up online to the phone to cancel
  14. Finnish Consumer Ombudsman (KKV), decision of 18 June 2025 on Elisa Oyj: online cancellation channel for broadband removed and cancellation calls used for marketing
  15. ACM (Netherlands), 10 February 2022: fine for misleading telemarketing of puzzle subscriptions (Servicecollect)
  16. AGCM (Italy), Bollettino n. 28 of 25 July 2022: commitments by Lead Career S.L. (onlinecv.it) on low-price trials that turn into a paid subscription, PS12148
  17. Landgericht Koblenz (Germany), judgment of 27 February 2024, 11 O 12/23: an online cancellation may not be made to depend on a confirmation phone call
  18. GVH (Hungary), 2023: CPC network action on subscription traps and card scheme commitments on recurring payment information

Further reading

  1. European Parliament Legislative Train, Digital Fairness Act (status: announced, expected Q4 2026)

Last checked against the source:

For information only. Not legal advice.